dogs for sale in new zealand
Does anyone else think there is a moral hazard by allowing the police to seize and sell stolen goods?
Someone steals your plasma TV. They go to another town drunk and trying to sell – but get trapped when the electronic store manager check his name with the police and have criminal records. However, because there is no central database of stolen goods, you do not receive your TV again. Oops, sorry, but as a victim who needs to travel around the country Searching through newspaper advertisements from the police. No, the police have, and sell it at an auction – win money for nice cars and wages. Who is fuck? You, the victim. Who benefits? The police. In some places, like New Zealand, nonviolent offenders often escape prison through windows. Is this really very difficult to stop …? Come and realize that we are allowing the Tigers to act as watchdogs – the police are Part of the problem of theft. Who else? Lawyers and legislators who ignore or do not understand the moral hazard by allowing funding to depend on police the sale of stolen property.
I'll answer that simply, I agree with you.
2009 New Zealand Bloodstock Breeders’ Stakes
